Friday, November 30, 2012

Essay #3c COMPARE & CONTRAST-All Together Now!







ESSAY #3c

COMPARE & CONTRASTAll Together Now!

INSTRUCTIONS: Find and post the images of the artwork(s) mentioned in the Topic Essay Question.

QUESTION: Would you describe the building of the Egyptian pyramids and the Cathedral of Our Lady of Chartres as a community or, a public works project? If yes, why and can you find other similarities. Research and select one other example of architecture from another culture, time period or geographic location and compare and contrast it to the other two to and describe why you selected it.




(http://www.culturefocus.com/egypt_pyramids.htm)

(http://www.culturefocus.com/egypt_pyramids.htm)


(http://www.francetripweb.com/chartres-cathedral-cathedral-of-our-lady-of-chartres-cathedrale-notre-dame-de-chartres-france.html)

(http://michaelbrewerphotos.photoshelter.com/image/I0000CiS4BlmSm0k)
 



Video created from images found through google.  Music in the background was purchased for the video.  This video was made specifically for the essay Compare & Contrast-All Together Now.








(http://www.sacred-destinations.com/italy/rome-colosseum)


(http://www.sacred-destinations.com/italy/rome-colosseum)


PART ONE

SUMMARY:  I jumped in with both feet on this one.  There wasn’t an option on how to go about the essay.  The structures are so different from each other that there is definite differences between the two mentioned and then you throw in a third into the mix and you have a whole different ball of wax.  My main problem I encountered was getting all of my images to show together.  I created a power point and was unable to find a way to insert it into the blog.  Technology overcame me.  I did find a way around the problem and was able to create a video of the images I wanted to display.

REASON:  I feel that the question was asked as a way to open up the mind to possibilities of how little things change or how much they change over a period of time.  I was tempted to add a structure that was from the early 1800’s.  I didn’t because it wasn’t from the time period of our course of study.  The building was built by volunteers.  I wanted to focus on our time period and that is what I believe you wanted us to do.  To look at structures from either different cultures or a range of time to see how they were created.  Were they created by slaves or by paid workers?

PURPOSE:  As far as purpose I think I have somewhat answered in my summary and reason.  We need to always think outside of the box.  To see what answers might be there and what might not be.  To look at what can be the possibility of choices made in history.  There are always the choices that we as students make.  How do we look at the question?  Do we see and understand what is behind the subtext of the wording?

DIRECTION:  I went into this with an open mind.  I learned a few things in what I read in the text.  I didn’t add that into the answer because it didn’t pertain to the question.  It did give me a broader scope of what was going on and so I could narrow down what I needed to be focused on.  It gave me an opportunity to answer the question with more knowledge and background.

IMPRESSION:  A lot of what was in this question I knew already from Western Civilization.  There were details that I was able to put into the piece that I had no clue about before I started the essay.  There is always more that we can all learn.  There isn’t a stopping point to what knowledge can be gained.  I did learn from the essay.  As they say a picture is worth a thousand words.  I could have painted or drawn my answer to the question.  The question would be would you understand what my meaning was. 
 
PART TWO

One person alone couldn’t create the structures mentioned below and pictured above.  Even with the technology of today we can’t create a structure similar to these alone.  We may have the equipment to make the work less strenuous.  There is beauty in all of the work pictured.  In the video the different photos and artwork wasn’t done as an individual either.]

 Egyptian pyramids are very massive in size.  The ones I have pictured are constructed with limestone and granite.  (Art History, Marilyn Stokstad/Michael W. Cothren, Fourth Edition/volumn 1, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc., page 56)  “Constructing the Pyramids.  Building a pyramid was a formidable undertaking.  A large worker’ burial ground discovered at Giza attest to the huge labor force that had to be assembled, housed, and fed.  Most of the cut stone blocks-each weighing an average of 2.5 tons-used in building the Giza complex were quarried either on the site or nearby.  Teams of workers transported them by sheer muscles power, employing small logs as rollers or pouring water on mud to create slippery surface over which they could drag the blocks on sleds.”   (Art History text, page 57)  The information found her shows it took a great amount of manpower to build the pyramids.  The wording “a large worker’ burial ground” tells us that many men worked on the pyramids.  There wouldn’t have been a large burial ground otherwise if it didn’t take many people to construct the pyramids. 

“Almost most impressive were the actual mechanics of construction.  Herodotus says that 100,000 men worked for twenty years fed on a diet of onions.  The blocks of stone, some of them 20 feet by 6 feet, would be brought from the quarry by barge at the height if the Nile flood, but they had to be handled at both ends of the journey and then dragged up a ramp of the Pyramid site, a hundred feet above the river.  Wedges, rockers, levers, cradles and sledges were all used.  The missing element was the wheel – no carts, no pulleys, no cranes.” (A Concise History of Western Architecture, R. Furneaux Jordan, 1983 Thames and Hudson Limited London, page 12)

With the technology of today it would take a lot of manpower and engineering to construct a pyramid.  We have information that tells us it took a lot of manpower and a lot of time to build the pyramids.  The people of the time wouldn’t have had a choice as we do now on whether or not they wanted to build the pyramids.  It is a sad thing the number of lives lost to build them.

“They say the Pharaohs built the pyramids Do you think one Pharaoh dropped one bead of sweat?   We built the pyramids for the Pharaohs and we’re building for them yet.” (Anna Louise Strong, http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/pyrami``ds.html)

The Cathedral of Our Lady of Chartres, I found a website on sacred destinations that gave a brief history of the building.  I think it is fitting to include the information given in the essay.  I am going to quote the whole article in its entirety so I don’t lose any of its meaning.

History

According to tradition, Chartres Cathedral has housed the tunic of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Sancta Camisia, since 876. The relic was said to have been given to the cathedral by Charlemagne, who received it as a gift during a trip to Jerusalem. Because of this relic, Chartres has been a very important Marian pilgrimage center and the faithful still come from the world over to honor it.
The present cathedral is one of several French Gothic masterpieces built because fire had destroyed its predecessors. After the first cathedral of any great substance burnt down in 1020, a glorious new Romanesque basilica with a massive crypt was built under the direction of Bishop Fulbert and later Geoffroy de Lèves.

The cathedral survived a fire in 1134 that destroyed much of the rest of the town, but was not so lucky on the night of June 10, 1194, when lightning ignited a great fire that destroyed all but the west towers, the façade and the crypt.

The people despaired when it seemed that the Sancta Camisia had also perished in the fire. But three days later it was found unharmed in the treasury, which the bishop proclaimed was a sign from Mary herself that another, even more magnificent, cathedral should be built in Chartres. Donations came in from all over France and rebuilding began almost immediately in 1194. The people of Chartres volunteered to haul the necessary stone from quarries 5 miles away.

The construction project used the plans laid out by the first architect in order to preserve the harmonious aspect of the cathedral. Work began first on the nave and by 1220 the main structure was complete, with the old crypt, the west towers and the west facade incorporated into the new building. On October 24, 1260, the cathedral was finally dedicated in the presence of King Louis IX and his family.

Chartres Cathedral was never destroyed nor looted during the French Revolution and the numerous restorations never have altered its glorious beauty. It always stayed the same: a great triumph of Gothic art. The cathedral was added to UNESCO's list of World Heritage Sites in 1979.”  (http://www.sacred-destinations.com/france/chartres-cathedral)

            The history here talks about rebuilding of the cathedral.  The people volunteered to carry the stone from the quarries.  It took a community to rebuild the cathedral.  One person couldn’t do it alone.  It took many years to complete.  

            “A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it. Bearing within him the image of a cathedral.” (Antoine de Saint-Exupery, http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/cathedral.html)  It may take one man to imagine what can become of a pile of rocks; however it takes many men to create it.

            Building the Colosseum - Who built the Roman Colosseum?
An estimated 100,000 prisoners were bought back to Rome as slaves after the Jewish War. Vespasian had a limitless work force. In the building of the Colosseum the slaves undertook the manual labor such as working in the quarries at Tivoli where the travertine was quarried. Slaves would also have been used to lift and transport the heavy stones 20 miles from Tivoli to Rome. Teams of professional Roman builders, engineers, artists, painters and decorators undertook the skilled tasks necessary for building the Colosseum.” (
http://www.roman-colosseum.info/colosseum/building-the-colosseum.htm)

            The Flavian Amphitheater or colosseum was Rome’s greatest arena.  It was an enormous entertainment center.  The other walls stand 159 feet in height.  It is an oval shape and its diameter is 615 feet by 510 feet.  The floor is 280 feel by 175 feet. (Art History text, page 188)  The size of the colosseum is important.  The time period is 70 CE to 80 CE (Art History text, page 188) and that shows that it wouldn’t have been a one man job.  This would have taken many workers.  As quoted above they brought in slaves to do the work.  In my next quote they state they were sailors that did the work.  It is past the building stage; however I consider this as part of the work in the colosseum.

 “The walls of the top level of the arena supported a huge awning that could shade the seating areas. Sailors, who had experience in handling ropes, pulleys, and large expanses of canvas, worked the apparatus that extended the awning.” (Art History text, page 189)  “ The velarium, slung from mast, was moved round as the hot afternoon wore on; it is said that sailors manipulated the ropes.   In fact this velarium may have done little more than shade the imperial box.” (Western Architecture text, pages 63 & 64) I quoted the two sources because they showed that even though the structure was completed it still took men to work the mechanisms to make the awning work.

In comparing the three different structures I can find some similarities.  In the Colosseum and the Pyramids they used slaves to do the work.  The stone work was heavy and took a lot of ingenuity to construct the projects.  With the Cathedral it talks about the rebuilding and using volunteers to do the work.  Did the people really have a choice in rebuilding the Cathedral?  Did they feel it was their duty as Christians to do the work?  There is a similarity between all of them.  It took a lot of manpower to do the work, and a lot of years to complete the structures.  Does it really make a difference if you volunteer to work or you are volunteered to do the work?  Either way you are working without compensation.  That is another similarity between all three.

I used the term men as a generalization.  There was a time before feminism that you could use the term men to mean men and women as a grouping.  That is what I did here.   My family is a big part of what helps me build my life.  I see this as the same as building a Cathedral.  My husband and I are the cornerstones of the building.  My children are the first set of stones.  The grand-children are the next level and on from there.  We can look at "All together now" in many different ways.





The Lunt Family (minus the grand-daughter not born when the photo was taken)

 

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Essay 7a: Faith and Belief



ESSAY 7a 


"Saint in Orant Pose, From Ivories of the So-Called Grado Chair, Eastern Mediterranean or Egypt, 7th-8th century, 10.3 × 8.3 × 0.8 cm, Musée National du Moyen Âge, Thermes et Hôtel de Cluny, Paris ( Cl. 1932 ), Image: Thierry Ollivier, Réunion des Musées Nationaux / Art Resource, NY." (Saint in Orant Pose )

ESSAY TITLE:
Faith and Belief

QUESTION: Is Art in any way, an intrinsic part of, or a primary factor in religion or religious expression and if so, how did it specifically play a part in the development of Christianity?

PART ONE

SUMMARY:  Art plays an important part in all aspects of life.  Art was used to express a story or enhance upon words.  The same icons were used and recycled to have a similar meaning for Christianity. 

REASON:  The reason for this question is to look into how art has evolved from one period into another.  

PURPOSE:  The purpose is to get us to think outside of the box.  To see what is considered Christian art and where its origins came from.

DIRECTION:  The ‘David Plates’ were striking and so that was the direction I decided to go.  There has to be choices made of where to start and where to end.  Art and religion are so intertwined it is difficult to choose what to talk about.  I chose one area to stay focused and not go into too many different directions.

IMPRESSIONS:  I think people of each time want to find their own meaning in each representation.  If I stand with my arms outstretched do I have a specific meaning?  For me I would open my arms as in welcome.  This is one of the things that has followed through in time.


PART TWO

ANSWER:  Art is a visual story. In 1902 they unearthed nine “David Plates” in Cyprus.
(Art History, Marilyn Stokstad/Michael W. Cothren, Fourth Edition/volumn 1, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc., page 217) “One of the ‘David Plates’ made in Constantinople, 629-630 CE. Silver, diameter 19 7/8” (49.4 cm).  Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York” (Art History text, page 216)

The plate tells a story, it is the story of David and Goliath.  The artist depicted the battle in the center of the plate and it is larger than the rest of the scenes.  The battle is brought to the forefront and given a greater place of importance.  “It may be surprising to see a Judeo-Christian subject portrayed in a style that was developed for the exploits of Classical heroes, but this mixture of traditions is typical of the eclecticism characterizing the visual arts as the Christianized Roman world became the Byzantine Empire.  Patrons saw no conflict between the artistic principles of the pagan past and the Christian teaching undergirding their imperial present.  To them, this Jewish subject, created for a Christian patron in a pagan style, would have attracted notice only because of its sumptuousness and its artistic virtuosity.” (Art History text, page 217)   Although these plates were commissioned for an individual patron, it is an example of storytelling.  The story of David and Goliath is in the Bible in the First book of Samuel Chapter 17, and to those who couldn’t read this is a great way to get a message across.

“The earliest Christians gathered to worship in private apartments or houses, or in buildings constructed after domestic models such as the third-century church-house excavated at Dura-Europos.  As their rites became more ritualized and complicated, however, Christians developed special buildings- churches and baptisteries-as well as specialized important stories and ideas.  The earliest surviving Christian art dates to the early third century and derives its styles and its imagery from Jewish and Roman visual traditions.  In this process, known as syncretism, artist assimilate images from other traditions and give them new meaning.  The borrowings can be unconscious or quite deliberate.”  (Art History text, page 222)  The explanation goes on further to talk about the orant figures.  The worshipers that had their arms spread out.  Depending on what belief system we are talking about there could be different meaning.  “In pagan art, he was Apollo, or Hermes the shepherd, or Orpheus among the animals, or a personification of philanthropy.  For Early Christians, he became the Good Shepherd of Psalms (Psalm 23) and the Gospels (Matthew 18:12-14, John 10:11-16).  Such images, therefore, do not have a stable meaning, but are associated with the meaning(s) that a particular viewer brings to them.  They remind rather than instruct.”  (Art History text, page 222)  The last sentence is an important one.  The art is a reminder of the stories that are part of the religion. 

Art and its Contexts (Art History text, page 231) This page has a detailed description of different events with the biblical stories.  An example of one: “Tribute Money: Challenged to pay the temple tax, Jesus sends Peter to catch a fish which turns out to have the required coin in its mouth. (Mat 17:24-27, Lk 20:20-25)” 

Art is still used as a visual aid to teach religion.  As the saying states “a picture is worth a thousand words.”  We can analyze each piece of religious art and see something different each time we look at it.  We might see something that is ‘Pagan’ or we might see something that is ‘Jewish’ or we might see something that leans towards the ‘Islam’ beliefs.  It might have been created to show a ‘Christian’ story.  As we have learned each generation takes something from the one before.  Art would have been around before Christianity and so they would have found meaning in what had come before.  Each religion could have embraced what had been created and made it their own.  It is the same with the different Christian religions today, there may be similar beliefs and they may use some of the same art; however, they might have a slight interpretation on the meaning of some of the pieces.  It would take a theologian to be able to understand all the different sub contexts of the differing ideals.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Essay #1c, Compare and Contrast-Mother Earth, Fertility, Love and More?



ESSAY #1c
 
COMPARE & CONTRAST – Mother Earth, Fertility, Love and More?

INSTRUCTIONS: Find and post the images of the artwork(s) mentioned in the Topic Essay Question.


QUESTION: Describe the functional purpose of the Venus of Willendorf and the Venus De Milo. How is their imagery similar? How is it different? Find a third Venus example to compare and contrast these two to and describe why you selected it.



Venus of Willendorf


Venus de Milo


the Mazarin Venus




PART ONE

SUMMARY: I gained a better understanding of the thought and reasoning that went behind creating the different Venus statues.

REASON:  The question was asked to create the thought process between the ages and to look at the difference and similarities.

PURPOSE:  I think we need to have a better understanding of how things can change and how they stay the same.  The figures might have evolved; however their meaning might still have similarities.

DIRECTION:  I tried to look at the art with new eyes.  I wanted to see if there was something that I had missed as I had looked at the statues/figures in the past.

IMPRESSIONS:  No matter what, there is always more you can learn.  I thought this would be a very difficult essay to write.  We had discussed the different statues and although they look different they in essence are the same.

PART TWO

ANSWER:

The Birth of Venus by William Adolphe Bouguereau 1879



Aphrodite (Venus), goddess of love, Daughter of Zeus and the water nymph Dione; alternatively, born of sea foam; wife of Hephaistos. (Art History, Marilyn Stokstad/Michael W. Cothren, Fourth Edition/volumn 1, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc., page 104)

The Venus of Willendorf most likely stands for fertility.  The swollen breast and the large belly with the wide hips could represent the female population of that culture were fertile.  The little statue might have been traded to other tribes to represent they were willing to come together to repopulate.   (Art History text, pages 6,7) The statue is from around 24,000 BCE.  She is small in size standing 4 3/8" and she is made of limestone. (Art History text, page 6)

The Venus de Milo is very statuesque.  She may be missing her arms; however you can sense the higher presence.   The Venus de Milo was "found on the island of Melos by French excavators in the early nineteenth century. (Art History text, page 156) She is styled in the fashion of the past artist.  "The dreamy gaze recalls Praziteles' work, and the figure has heavier proportions of High Classical sculpture, but the twisting stance and the strong projection of the knee are typical of Hellenistic art, as is the rich three-dimensionality of the drapery.  The juxtaposition of soft flesh and crisp drapery, seemingly in the process of slipping off the figure adds a note of erotic tension." (Art History text, page 156Venus de Milo also known as Aphrodite of Melos is housed in the Louvre in Paris.  She is from c. 150-100 BCE, she is marble, and stands 6' 8" tall. (Art History text, page 157)  She is also pictured in the textbook on this page.

The imagery of the two both shows the female form.  They both have an emphasis on the breast, although the Venus de Milo might have a bit more finesse to the shape, with no emphasis on modesty.  They are representations of fertility.  In both statues the hips appear to be able to bear children, and that would be another important factor in fertility.

For my third Venus, I found the Mazarin Venus.  Her form is very similar to the Venus de Milo.  Her stance is different.  I can see the shape and the statuesque shape to her to be very similar. 
  
"Venus, the goddess of love, stands nude, grasping a piece of cloth around her hips. The dolphin at her feet supports the figure and alludes to the goddess's birth from the sea. This depiction of Venus ultimately derived from an extremely popular Greek statue created by the sculptor Praxiteles about 350 B.C. Indeed Praxiteles' statue was so popular that, beginning around 100 B.C., many artists created variations on his theme of the naked Venus.

This statue is a Roman reproduction of one of those Hellenistic variants. In 1509 it was discovered in Rome, where it contributed to the Renaissance revival of the Classical tradition. Scholars once believed that this statue was owned by Cardinal Mazarin, advisor to Louis XIV, king of France. Although this is unlikely, the statue is still known to many as the Mazarin Venus.

During its long history, the statue has been heavily damaged. The breasts, as well as parts of the cloth, arms, and dolphin, are restored. The head probably belonged to another ancient statue. Marks on the back of the statue have been interpreted as gunshot wounds suffered during the French Revolution, although this story may be based more in romance than in fact." (http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=7562)

"Around 350 BCE, Praxiteles created a daring statue of Aphrodite for the city of Knido in Asia Minor.  Although artists of the fifth century BCE had begun to hint boldly at the naked female body beneath tissue thin drapery, as in Nike Adjusting her Sandal, this Aphrodite was apparently the first statue by a well known Greek sculptor to depict a fully nude woman, and it set a new standard.  Although nudity among athletic young men was admired in Greek society, nudity among women was seen as a sign of low character.  The eventual wide acceptance of female nudes in large statuary may be related to the gradual merging of the Greeks' concept of their goddess Aphrodite with some of the characteristics of Phoenician goddess Astarte (the Babyloninan Ishatar), who was always shown nude in Near Eastern Art."  (Art History text, page 145

Culture diverted away from nude women.  Finally, the sculptures of women in their natural form were created and seemingly accepted.  All three of the sculptures celebrate women and their form.  The historians have taught us they are shown in this form as fertility.  Between all three I see curves and shape and definition.  The draping of the fabric is very similar on the second two Venus figures.  They are more refined as art had come a long way since the first had been created.  The Venus of Willendorf is basic; however it does have its own definition of form. 
  
I added a painting of the birth of Venus.  I thought it a fitting start to the essay.  She and the Venus de Milo do have the s curve to their stance.  The dolphin is in the painting the same as in the Mazarin Venus.  This is reinforcing the birth from the sea.  She is standing on a shell, as if she is rising up from the sea.  There are angels circling above and there are a couple of men blowing in conch shells in triumph of her birth.